Over the past few years, shows like “The Daily Show With Jon Stewart” and “The Colbert Report” have increased in popularity due to one major reason – in addition to being really funny, they have a team of top notch researchers who prove that politicians and public figures should be careful what they say in public, especially with cameras abound, as words that you have spoken can (and will) often come back to bite you in the arse!
I was watching the Colbert Report last night, and his opening segment was about the debt ceiling and how Republicans have made their stand by linking any increase in the debt ceiling with substantial spending cuts, most probably to appease their Tea Party counterparts. Colbert then went on to state that under the previous president, George W Bush, Republicans voted no less than 7 times to increase the debt ceiling. As then Vice President Dick Cheney declared in 2002, “Reagan proved that deficits don’t matter”. I guess that’s only true until there’s a Democrat in the White House!! Remember, President Bush inherited a surplus, i.e. the Government was “in the black” when he took office. He made his (in)famous $1.4 trillion tax cut in 2001, followed by a $550 billion round in 2003. Even before the Wall Street Bailout, President Bush was responsible for a mind numbingly $4 trillion increase in this country’s national debt. That is an increase of 71%!!
If you dig deeper into this, you’ll find that tax rates overall are at the lowest rates since the 1950s. However, if you listen to the Republican Party, higher taxes are what is keeping the economy from flourishing. It seems that the Republicans are for tax cuts for only those of us who really don’t need them. I’ve heard of this trickle down effect before – if you help the richer then the the poorer amongst will benefit from a trickle down effect. The only problem with that logic is that while the benefits to the rich are more or less immediate, the standard of their living is far, far higher than the average American, who can ill afford to wait for the wealth and prosperity to trickle down to them. To be honest, the only thing that is trickling down it warm and yellow and smells pretty bad. I’m sure you know what I am referring to.
My friend Jeremy once told me that it was unfair to expect the richest Americans to carry the burden of the rest of the country – that it was unfair to penalize folks for being rich. He did have a point – it is unfair to hate someone because they are better off than you. At that point I did change my thinking – but it has evolved to a more balanced point of view, which does lead me to the same conclusion. President Bush’s tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans are unfair. We seem to be in a state where the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. To quote the Poison song “Something to believe in” :
I drive by the homeless sleeping on the cold dark street
Like bodies in an unmarked grave
Underneath the broken old neon sign
That used to read “Jesus Saves”
And miles away lived the rich folk
And I see how they’re living it up
While the poor they eat from hand to mouth
The rich is drinking from a golden cup
And it just makes me wonder
Why so many lose, so few win?
Anyway, to get back to the Colbert Report. He went on to say that yesterday’s vote on raising the debt ceiling, which was originally brought up by a Republican, was little more than a farce. They blocked an attempt raise the debt ceiling which was brought up by Congressman Dave Camp. He actually spoke up saying that it should not pass. However, that was not the most interesting thing that occurred – as the NY Times reported, Republican leaders called Wall Street Executives before the vote to assure them that the vote was just for show. So they essentially showed their Tea Party counterparts that they are “serious” on debt reduction but also keep their Wall Street supporters entertained with political theatre. As Colbert put it, Republicans can say one thing to their Tea Party followers and another to Wall Street executives. The only thing is that to one of these groups, the Republicans are talking out of their asses. As Colbert put it “don’t tell me which one, I’ve Tivo’ing the end of the economy”
Don’t get me wrong – political theatre is present on both sides of the idealogical divide. It’s unfortunately become part and parcel of today’s political landscape. However, the Republicans seem to be worse off when it comes to scaring people, as well as misrepresenting the truth. There are double standards today that the Republicans seem to be blissfully ignorant about, when it comes to talking to the press. I do hear the word “lame stream media” being tossed around when it comes to reporting on Republicans. Maybe there is some truth in that – that they are biased against a lot of Republicans. If you take that route though, then wouldn’t you also agree that Fox News is even more biased towards the Republicans? If any network were to be accused of bias and rampant pro party commentaries then good old Fox News would be top of that list.
Consider this – Sarah Palin is currently going across the country in her large bus with her family acting as if she is gearing up for her run for President. However, as was pointed out on The Daily Show a couple of days ago, she is still under contract to Fox News with a 6 figure salary, and as such, is contractually not allowed to give interviews to other networks. She’s not letting the press know where she is going next so that she can allegedly make the lame stream media work. Oh, except for Fox News of course, because as I had mentioned, she is an employee.
It was only yesterday that I realized something – if Sarah Palin had declared her candidacy, she would have to resign from her cushy Fox News job, They made Huckabee declare weeks ago – but not Palin – I wonder why?
Since we’re talking about Sarah Palin, let’s look at some of her more recent comments.
1. When talking about the national debt, she made a claim that was originally stated by Ms Pinocchio herself, another bastion of truth, Michelle Bachmann. Palin said that Obama had passed “a trillion dollars in stimulus package projects that still have resulted in record-setting unemployment, a heartbreaking number of home foreclosures, crashed markets left and right.”
So everyone knows that the Stimulus Plan was $800 billion – a large amount, but not $1 trillion. Maybe Sarah Palin has some otherworldly math that she can use to show us how $800 billion = $1 trillion ?
Record setting unemployment – in 1992, when Ronald Reagan was president, the unemployment rate had topped 9.7% – it reached 9.6% in 2010 – too high for anyone’s liking, but by no means a record.
I don’t see a connection between the Stimulus Package and home foreclosures or markets crashing “left and right”. Maybe in Sarah Palin’s mind, she can just say something and it will be true? Just a thought!
2. When talking about the impacts of the drilling permit moratorium in the Gulf of Mexico, Palin said “We are going to be looking at $8 billion a day that we are going to be pouring into foreign countries in order to import that make-up fuel that we are going to need to take place of what we could have gotten out of the Gulf.” From all reports, she was quite demonstrative when she spoke about oil, as she has the “drill baby, drill” logo over her bus’ gas cap, and obviously is passionate about this topic. It’s a pity that she wasn’t as accurate or truthful as she was emphatic. Her logic behind the $8 billion was that we were looking at “150,000 barrels less per day next year and 200,000 barrels per day less being able to be developer from the Gulf in the year after..”
Look at it like this – the entire world consumes 85 million barrels of oil a day. If you use a calculator, you’ll see that at $100 per barrel, 200,000 barrels of oil a day comes to $20 million a day. Can you make $20 million = $8 billion? I can’t.
To me, Sarah Palin is out for only one thing. And for one reason, and one reason only.
To get back at Katie Couric. Why? Well, she asked the one question that proved to be the beginning of the end for Sarah Palin, and no matter how you try to spin it, it’s just a simple question that has no “gotcha” attachments – what newspapers do you read? Palin could have said that she didn’t read one particular paper, that she got her news online or from the TV. Instead, she showed the world that she doesn’t read the news, (at that time) has never left the country and would say anything if it sounded good, irrespective of the facts ( I can see Russia from here).
Sarah Palin is not alone in this. I mentioned Michelle Bachmann, and everyone of course knows of Mr Newt “I had affairs because I am a patriot” Gingrich, who said in an interview that Congressman Paul Ryan’s Medicare Slashing budget was a piece of “right wing social engineering.” He took a lot of flak from fellow Republicans on that. So the next day he took it back, actually trying to make the case that if anyone tried to quote him on that interview, it would be a gross violation of ethics. He said “I want to make sure that every House Republican is protected from some kind of dishonest Democratic ad. So let me say on the record, any ad which quotes what I said on Sunday is a falsehood.”
Really, Newt?
As a matter of fact, you claim you no longer hold that view, but you can’t tell people that you didn’t say it. It’s a televised interview. You weren’t tricked, as it was a simple question that you answered, and answered truthfully. Like so many politicians before you, you are changing your view to benefit your chances – not because you believe it.
Part of me is worried. Someone like Palin or Bachmann or even Gingrich in power would make this fine country a place that would not be as welcoming as it has been. On the other hand, if that is the opposition, then maybe that spells good news for President Obama. I still feel that George W Bush didn’t so much win the election in 2004 as the Democrats gave it away.
Anyway, I’m done now – off my soapbox.
Here’s a song that I talked about earlier. It’s Poison’s “Something to believe in”
Peace!